2022
Hotak, Nematullah; Kaneko, Shinji
In: Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 73, pp. 285-298, 2022, ISSN: 03135926.
@article{Hotak2022,
title = {Fiscal illusion of the stated preferences of government officials regarding interministerial policy packages: A case study on child labor in Afghanistan},
author = {Nematullah Hotak and Shinji Kaneko},
doi = {10.1016/j.eap.2021.11.019},
issn = {03135926},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Economic Analysis and Policy},
volume = {73},
pages = {285-298},
publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},
abstract = {Fiscal illusion refers to taxpayers’ perceptions of the gap between their burden and their expectations regarding the provision of public services. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive picture of the preferences of central government officials with respect to a hypothetical interministerial anti-child labor policy program. In our randomized conjoint analysis, the policy program consists of five attributes: (i) share of open-air classes; (ii) share of qualified teachers; (iii) provision of child allowance; (iv) female labor participation; and (v) an attribute related to the scale of budget, defined by either tax payment or share of government expenditure. The respondents were randomly assigned to two groups by assigning different fifth attributes. We compared the supporting rate for the proposed anti-child labor policy program between the two groups of 605 respondents: tax payment and share of government expenditure. Thus, our primary goal was to compare two attributes. We found that the average marginal component effects (AMCEs) between the two attributes showed completely opposite directions, suggesting that a significant fiscal illusion problem exists among central government officials working in Kabul. Moreover, women and staff in lower positions of government were found to be more biased. It should be noted that, due to insensitivity to the tax payment levels when they are set by the comparable range of scale of budget with the share of government expenditures, and our setting of the levels of two attributes on different scales, the study demonstrates a mere qualitative comparison.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Fiscal illusion refers to taxpayers’ perceptions of the gap between their burden and their expectations regarding the provision of public services. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive picture of the preferences of central government officials with respect to a hypothetical interministerial anti-child labor policy program. In our randomized conjoint analysis, the policy program consists of five attributes: (i) share of open-air classes; (ii) share of qualified teachers; (iii) provision of child allowance; (iv) female labor participation; and (v) an attribute related to the scale of budget, defined by either tax payment or share of government expenditure. The respondents were randomly assigned to two groups by assigning different fifth attributes. We compared the supporting rate for the proposed anti-child labor policy program between the two groups of 605 respondents: tax payment and share of government expenditure. Thus, our primary goal was to compare two attributes. We found that the average marginal component effects (AMCEs) between the two attributes showed completely opposite directions, suggesting that a significant fiscal illusion problem exists among central government officials working in Kabul. Moreover, women and staff in lower positions of government were found to be more biased. It should be noted that, due to insensitivity to the tax payment levels when they are set by the comparable range of scale of budget with the share of government expenditures, and our setting of the levels of two attributes on different scales, the study demonstrates a mere qualitative comparison.
Yamane, Tomomi; Kaneko, Shinji
In: Global Environmental Change, vol. 73, 2022, ISSN: 09593780.
@article{Yamane2022c,
title = {Does hostility affect public support for the provision of global public goods among competing neighboring countries? A survey experiment in Northeast Asia},
author = {Tomomi Yamane and Shinji Kaneko},
doi = {10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102455},
issn = {09593780},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Global Environmental Change},
volume = {73},
publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},
abstract = {Cooperation beyond the borders of sovereign states and investment in global public goods (GPGs) are essential for tackling transboundary challenges, such as climate change, marine pollution, and health security. However, little is known about how regional tension or isolationism might affect cooperation with neighboring countries on transboundary issues. Thus, in this study, using a conjoint experiment of representative samples from members of the public in Japan, China, and South Korea, we investigated: 1) public support for GPGs using the case of trilateral cooperation for the establishment of common global funds among Japan, China, and South Korea; and 2) the extent to which hostility toward neighboring countries affects such public support. The results showed that Chinese people had lower hostility toward neighboring countries and higher public support. Both Japanese and South Koreans had higher hostility. Meanwhile, public support was lower in Japan but moderate in South Korea. These results suggest that hostility toward neighboring countries affects public support for GPGs. The stronger the hostility toward neighboring countries is, the lower the public support for international cooperation becomes. However, the mechanisms of these effects are complex. Generally, hostility toward a government has more negative effects than hostility toward people of the same country. Furthermore, the present study provides important insights based on the findings that Chinese strongly supported building GPGs with neighboring countries, and people in all three countries somewhat supported equal sharing of the financial burden. However, authorization mechanisms for GPGs are essential, because citizens most supported GPGs managed by their home country. Thus, adopting authorization mechanisms to mutually manage funds is essential for widening public support for GPGs.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cooperation beyond the borders of sovereign states and investment in global public goods (GPGs) are essential for tackling transboundary challenges, such as climate change, marine pollution, and health security. However, little is known about how regional tension or isolationism might affect cooperation with neighboring countries on transboundary issues. Thus, in this study, using a conjoint experiment of representative samples from members of the public in Japan, China, and South Korea, we investigated: 1) public support for GPGs using the case of trilateral cooperation for the establishment of common global funds among Japan, China, and South Korea; and 2) the extent to which hostility toward neighboring countries affects such public support. The results showed that Chinese people had lower hostility toward neighboring countries and higher public support. Both Japanese and South Koreans had higher hostility. Meanwhile, public support was lower in Japan but moderate in South Korea. These results suggest that hostility toward neighboring countries affects public support for GPGs. The stronger the hostility toward neighboring countries is, the lower the public support for international cooperation becomes. However, the mechanisms of these effects are complex. Generally, hostility toward a government has more negative effects than hostility toward people of the same country. Furthermore, the present study provides important insights based on the findings that Chinese strongly supported building GPGs with neighboring countries, and people in all three countries somewhat supported equal sharing of the financial burden. However, authorization mechanisms for GPGs are essential, because citizens most supported GPGs managed by their home country. Thus, adopting authorization mechanisms to mutually manage funds is essential for widening public support for GPGs.
Caro-Burnett, Johann; Kaneko, Shinji
Is Society Ready for AI Ethical Decision Making? Lessons from a Study on Autonomous Cars Journal Article
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 98, 2022, ISSN: 22148051.
@article{nokey,
title = {Is Society Ready for AI Ethical Decision Making? Lessons from a Study on Autonomous Cars},
author = {Johann Caro-Burnett and Shinji Kaneko},
doi = {10.1016/j.socec.2022.101881},
issn = {22148051},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics},
volume = {98},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
abstract = {We conduct two separate experiments to study the social acceptance of AI ethical decision making. In the first experiment, we test whether there is an “unfounded” fear of technology. We contrast two methods to measure this fear: an indirect method that measures preferences implicitly and a direct method that measures preferences explicitly. Direct questions show that humans have an aversion to AI; however, indirect questions show that humans are not averse to the implementation of new technologies. We provide a theory to identify the cause of this discrepancy: in addition to their own preferences, subjects largely weight social preferences in direct questions. In the second experiment, we study how humans react to different ways of introducing this new technology to society and find that part of the fear of AI may be related to trust in one's government. Our results show that although individuals do not have a bias against AI, its explicit discussion may generate antagonism.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
We conduct two separate experiments to study the social acceptance of AI ethical decision making. In the first experiment, we test whether there is an “unfounded” fear of technology. We contrast two methods to measure this fear: an indirect method that measures preferences implicitly and a direct method that measures preferences explicitly. Direct questions show that humans have an aversion to AI; however, indirect questions show that humans are not averse to the implementation of new technologies. We provide a theory to identify the cause of this discrepancy: in addition to their own preferences, subjects largely weight social preferences in direct questions. In the second experiment, we study how humans react to different ways of introducing this new technology to society and find that part of the fear of AI may be related to trust in one's government. Our results show that although individuals do not have a bias against AI, its explicit discussion may generate antagonism.
Hussainzada, Wahidullah; Lee, Han Soo
In: Scientific Reports, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 5186, 2022, ISSN: 2045-2322.
@article{Hussainzada2022b,
title = {Effect of an improved agricultural irrigation scheme with a hydraulic structure for crop cultivation in arid northern Afghanistan using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)},
author = {Wahidullah Hussainzada and Han Soo Lee},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-09318-2},
issn = {2045-2322},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
volume = {12},
issue = {1},
pages = {5186},
abstract = {<p>The current study focuses on water scarcity, water shortages, and inequal water allocation for downstream water users in the Balkhab River basin (BRB) in northern Afghanistan. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to determine the hydrological process in the watershed and assess the water resource capacity. The model was calibrated and validated to ensure proper model setup for the entire watershed. The analysis of the current water management and allocation scheme indicated inadequate water distributions for the downstream irrigation canals. The current water allocation approach was modified based on crop water requirements and the available agricultural lands. A new irrigation scheme was proposed and included in the SWAT model that does not decrease upstream water allocation. The annual streamflow in the Balkhab River can supply the extra allocated water downstream without influencing the upstream water. Notably, a dam was proposed in the middle stream to store water during the winter and early spring seasons, as well as floodwater. The model outcomes showed that the existing annual streamflow in the river can fully support the irrigation of currently available land and an extra 18,470.6 ha of agricultural lands in the BRB. The results of this study can contribute to scientific evidence-based policy and decision-making processes for sustainable agricultural water resource management and flood control in the study region.</p>},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
<p>The current study focuses on water scarcity, water shortages, and inequal water allocation for downstream water users in the Balkhab River basin (BRB) in northern Afghanistan. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to determine the hydrological process in the watershed and assess the water resource capacity. The model was calibrated and validated to ensure proper model setup for the entire watershed. The analysis of the current water management and allocation scheme indicated inadequate water distributions for the downstream irrigation canals. The current water allocation approach was modified based on crop water requirements and the available agricultural lands. A new irrigation scheme was proposed and included in the SWAT model that does not decrease upstream water allocation. The annual streamflow in the Balkhab River can supply the extra allocated water downstream without influencing the upstream water. Notably, a dam was proposed in the middle stream to store water during the winter and early spring seasons, as well as floodwater. The model outcomes showed that the existing annual streamflow in the river can fully support the irrigation of currently available land and an extra 18,470.6 ha of agricultural lands in the BRB. The results of this study can contribute to scientific evidence-based policy and decision-making processes for sustainable agricultural water resource management and flood control in the study region.</p>
Tuy, Soklin; Lee, Han Soo; Chreng, Karodine
In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 163, pp. 112501, 2022, ISSN: 13640321.
@article{Tuy2022b,
title = {Integrated assessment of offshore wind power potential using Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) downscaling with Sentinel-1 satellite imagery, optimal sites, annual energy production and equivalent CO2 reduction},
author = {Soklin Tuy and Han Soo Lee and Karodine Chreng},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2022.112501},
issn = {13640321},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},
volume = {163},
pages = {112501},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2021
Anh, L Hoang; Quan, N Van; Nghia, L Tuan; Xuan, T Dang
Phenolic allelochemicals: Achievements, limitations, and prospective approaches in weed management Journal Article
In: Weed Biology and Management, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 37-67, 2021.
@article{nokey,
title = {Phenolic allelochemicals: Achievements, limitations, and prospective approaches in weed management},
author = {L Hoang Anh and N Van Quan and L Tuan Nghia and T Dang Xuan},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85107823696&doi=10.1111%2Fwbm.12230&partnerID=40&md5=caf12da0a9a74cf1e5784fa98b39759c},
doi = {10.1111/wbm.12230},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
urldate = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Weed Biology and Management},
volume = {21},
issue = {2},
pages = {37-67},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}